f4
Surrey v Kent
First-Class matches in England 1773
VenueLaleham Burway Cricket Ground, Laleham Burway on 21st, 22nd June 1773 (2-day match)
Balls per over4
TossToss not known
ResultSurrey won by 34 runs
Close of play day 1
Surrey first inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
Earl of Tankervilleb [unknown]15     
R Stoneb [unknown]35     
M Lewisb [unknown]2     
JT de Burghb [unknown]0     
J Edmeadsc [unknown] b [unknown]11     
W Yaldenb [unknown]9     
E Stevensrun out10     
J Woodb [unknown]3     
T Whitenot out44     
W Palmerb [unknown]8     
R Francisb [unknown]30     
Extras(8 b)8
Total(all out)175
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-175
Kent bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Dorset????--
Wheeler????--
Kent first inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
Duke of Dorsetb [unknown]14     
Sir H Mannb [unknown]1     
JB Davisb [unknown]23     
E Husseyb [unknown]7     
R Millerb [unknown]4     
T Pattendenrun out25     
F Bookerb [unknown]2     
RN Newmannot out28     
J Fugglesc [unknown] b [unknown]3     
T Mayb [unknown]20     
J Wheelerb [unknown]1     
Extras(5 b)5
Total(all out)133
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-133
Surrey bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Stevens????--
Wood????--
Surrey second inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
Earl of Tankervilleb [unknown]2     
R Stoneb [unknown]2     
M Lewisb [unknown]9     
JT de Burghb [unknown]0     
J Edmeadsb [unknown]0     
W Yaldenb [unknown]0     
E Stevensb [unknown]11     
J Woodc [unknown] b [unknown]6     
T Whitenot out22     
W Palmerc [unknown] b [unknown]3     
R Francisb [unknown]9     
Extras(5 b)5
Total(all out)69
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-69
Kent bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Dorset????--
Wheeler????--
Kent second inningsRunsBallsMins4s6s
Duke of Dorsetb [unknown]6     
Sir H Mannb [unknown]8     
JB Davisnot out4     
E Husseyb [unknown]9     
R Millerb [unknown]18     
T Pattendenb [unknown]4     
F Bookerb [unknown]4     
RN Newmanb [unknown]0     
J Fugglesb [unknown]6     
T Mayrun out10     
J Wheelerb [unknown]0     
Extras(8 b)8
Total(all out)77
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-77
Surrey bowlingOversMdnsRunsWktsWidesNo-Balls
Stevens????--
Wood????--
Notes
--> Earl of Tankerville made his debut in First-Class matches
--> R Stone made his debut in First-Class matches
--> M Lewis made his debut in First-Class matches
--> JT de Burgh made his debut in First-Class matches
--> R Francis made his debut in First-Class matches
--> Duke of Dorset made his debut in First-Class matches
--> Sir H Mann made his debut in First-Class matches
--> JB Davis made his debut in First-Class matches
--> E Hussey made his debut in First-Class matches
--> F Booker made his debut in First-Class matches
--> RN Newman made his debut in First-Class matches
--> J Wheeler made his debut in First-Class matches
--> JT de Burgh made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> J Fuggles made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> J Wheeler made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> T White (1) passed his previous highest score of 35 in First-Class matches
--> T Pattenden (1) passed his previous highest score of 20 in First-Class matches
--> T May (1) passed his previous highest score of 18 in First-Class matches
Bowlers for England: Dorset and Wheeler; for Surrey: Stevens and Wood. The sources give details of how players were dismissed, but not by whom. Teams are listed by social status: nobility, gentry, then 'other ranks'. Lewis in the Surrey side is assumed to be M Lewis, whom a report in the Hampshire Chronicle includes in the Surrey team for a match against Hambledon Town in August, with 'Lewis, Esq' down to play for Hambledon (thus contradicting SB, which gives the Lewises the other way round).
RM also gives each player's means of dismissal (bowled, caught, run out) for this match, but not by whom the dismissal was effected. It differs in some details from the LlEP version above and is given for all 11 in each innings, i.e. no not outs, so the RM score is less reliable and LlEP's identification of Pattenden as Thomas rather than William is also preferred.