| P | WBF | WBS | WLO | T | TLO | L | LLO | D | NDA | NR | A | BatBP | BowBP | Adj | Pts | |||
| 1 | Brentwood | 18 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 299 | |
| 2 | Wanstead | 18 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 16 | 0 | 264 | |
| 3 | Chelmsford | 18 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 19 | -4 | 245 | |
| 4 | Loughton | 18 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 27 | 0 | 223 | |
| 5 | Hainault and Clayhall | 18 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 26 | 0 | 208 | |
| 6 | Colchester and East Essex | 18 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 35 | 0 | 203 | |
| 7 | Woodford Wells | 18 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 26 | 0 | 202 | |
| 8 | Ilford | 18 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 31 | 0 | 180 | |
| 9 | Upminster | 18 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 34 | -1 | 173 | |
| 10 | Gidea Park and Romford | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 36 | 0 | 91 |
| Points Awarded and Column Key: | |
| Won batting first (WBF): 25 | |
| Won batting second (WBS): 20 | |
| Won limited overs match (WLO): 20 | |
| Tied (T): 8 | |
| Tied limited overs match (TLO): 8 | |
| Lost (L): 0 | |
| Lost limited overs match (LLO): 0 | |
| Drawn (D): 3 | |
| No Decision on 1st innings but abandoned points awarded as so little play (NDA): 6 | |
| No Result (but play started) (NR): 6 | |
| Abandoned without a ball bowled (A): 6 | |
| Batting Bonus Points (BatBP) | |
| Bowling Bonus Points (BowBP) | |
| Adjustments (carried forward/fines/penalty points) (Adj) | |
| Total points (Pts) |
| Order in the table: | |
| Position of teams in the table is determined by: | |
| Total points |
| Adjustments: | |
| Upminster: 1 point deducted for slow over-rate in match against Wanstead on 29th May 2010 | |
| Chelmsford: 4 points deducted for slow over-rate in match against Ilford on 7th August 2010 |