P | W | L | NR | BP | Pts | NetRR | |||
1 | Western Australia | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 0.172 | |
2 | New South Wales | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 0.243 | |
3 | South Australia | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 25 | -0.084 | |
4 | Queensland | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 20 | -0.179 | |
5 | Tasmania | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 0.137 | |
6 | Victoria | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 14 | -0.258 |
Points Awarded and Column Key: | |
Won (W): 4 | |
Lost (L): 0 | |
No Result (but play started) (NR): 2 | |
Bonus Points (BP) | |
Total points (Pts) | |
Net run rate (runs per over scored less runs per over conceded, adjusting team batting first to overs of team batting second in rain rule matches, adjusting to team's full allocation if all out, and ignoring no result matches) (NetRR) |
Order in the table: | |
Position of teams in the table is determined by: | |
Total points | |
Head-to-head result (if more than two teams level head-to-head only applies if all those teams have played the same number of matches against each other) | |
Net run rate (runs per over scored less runs per over conceded, adjusting team batting first to overs of team batting second in rain rule matches, adjusting to team's full allocation if all out, and ignoring no result matches) |
Notes: | |
In rain affected matches net run rate for the team batting first was assessed on the basis of their highest scoring overs equal to the number allocated to the team batting second, and so the actual net run rates for the following teams were different from those calculated using the normal method shown above: Western Australia 0.18, Tasmania 0.17, Victoria -0.29 |